2024 Incentive Compensation Management Report

How forward-thinking compensation teams can move from cost center to strategic lever

What does incentive compensation management look like today?
How can those who manage it overcome their biggest challenges to improve outcomes?

These are the questions we set out to answer with our inaugural State of Incentive Compensation Management Report, which saw our team surveying 200 professionals directly involved in managing incentive compensation to learn more about what they’re focused on, what’s blocking them, and where there are opportunities to make ICM a more
strategic function.

Managing compensation complexities at scale

Despite the economic uncertainties and market fluctuations faced by many over the past few years, compensation professionals report the organizations they work for are growing – and their programs need to scale and evolve in parallel with growth and expansion to ensure continuous alignment with business priorities.

Download the report →
1
/
3
3

manage 1,000+ payees

49
%

manage  >25 plans

49
hours

per month spent on manual tasks

61
hours

per month for those who manage >25 plans

Finding opportunities
to become more strategic

Despite comp admins reporting they’re satisfied with many aspects of their incentive comp program, there’s still a lot of manual work being done and a desire to move towards more strategic work. Essentially, there’s plenty of room for optimization and improvement.

Download the report →

Which of these apply to your incentive compensation program?

Calculating commissions in an accurate and timely manner
46%
Optimizing compensation program based on insights
46%
Having automated the commissions process end-to-end
43%
Analyzing the perfomance of compensation program
34%
Providing real-time transparency to sellers to boost motivation
24%
None
1%

There’s a lot of manual work being done by compensation leaders, and a desire to shift toward more strategic work.

Manual vs Automated Tasks

Process commission payouts
29%
36%
65%
36%
1%
Field and respond to rep inquiries
35%
31%
66%
31%
3%
Triage payout reviews & approvals
28%
36%
64%
32%
5%
Make compensation plan adjustments
36%
28%
64%
33%
4%
Explain comp plans to sales representatives
39%
28%
67%
28%
6%
Troubleshoot errors & inaccuracy
32%
34%
66%
32%
3%
Converting payout currencies
39%
29%
68%
29%
4%
I complete this manually myself
Someone else in the team does this manually
This has been automated
N/A

Only 25% of those surveyed feel they can currently dedicate the right split between tactical and strategic tasks.

Current vs Ideal Split: Tactical vs Strategic

46
%
48
%

of time spent on strategic initiatives (performance analysis, plan optimization, commissions reporting)

54
%
52
%

of time spent on tactical tasks (cleanup, calculations, adjustments, process management)

Many discuss the transformative potential of compensation strategies in altering behavior, yet few employ it as a strategic tool. Instead, they become entangled in the minutiae of managing existing compensation structures. Overwhelmed by administrative duties, decision-makers often neglect to critically assess which behaviors they aim to incentivize and understand the subsequent effects on business performance and employee focus within variable compensation frameworks.”

Matt Curl

SVP & GM, Checkr

Motivating teams with incentives to efficiently drive growth

Strategic program planning that properly aligns with organizational goals is key for motivating the right GTM behaviors – but clarity, visibility, and communication to inspire payee trust are the necessary ingredients for driving the intended results.

Download the report →
85
%

agree that representatives who have visibility into their compensation performance
are more motivated

What level of detail are individuals provided in your 
commission statements?

7%
32%
40%
20%
Don’t receive commission statements
Receive basic payout information or rudimentary commission statements
Receive a clear breakdown of the payout and all the details behind it
Receive a running breakdown of the payout that includes metrics and visualization, within the period as well as at the end

How many inquiries from sales reps do you receive per pay period?

Manage 26+ plan type
5%
71%
21%
Manage 1-25 plan type
7%
23%
51%
11%
7%
All compensation professionals
4%
14%
61%
16%
5%
6-10
11-20
21-50
51-100
101+

Creating impactful
incentive programs

Measuring plan impact, reporting on performance, and surfacing key data points for analysis is absolutely essential for strategic program success.

Download the report →

Incentive Compensation Review:
Reporting Frequency

Individual or team level sales performance
27%
33%
28%
12%
Forecasting
34%
28%
25%
13%
Compliance related reporting
31%
35%
23%
11%
Compensation cost of sales
38%
26%
20%
16%
Payout expense reporting
38%
27%
23%
12%
Plan performance reporting
32%
32%
25%
11%
Run regularly
Have access but don’t run regurlary
Run ad hoc at the request of leadership
Would get value out but don’t have access to

How do you measure the effectiveness of your compensation program?

Percent of commissions accuracy
44%
Revenue growth
42%
Commissions time-to-payroll
42%
Percentage of sales representatives hitting quota
37%
Commissions expense against sales yield
27%
None
1%

Organizations measure the actual effectiveness of their compensation programs with:

44
%

Percent of commissions accuracy

42
%

Revenue growth

42
%

Commissions time-to-payroll